Lojale Lucky

Lojale Lucky

Lucky Who, München: 29 Bewertungen - bei TripAdvisor auf Platz von von München Restaurants; mit 3,5/5 von Reisenden bewertet. Lucky Sushi in Erding bietet Leistungen und Services aus dem gastronomischen Bereich an. China-Restaurant Lucky, Gaildorf. Gefällt 95 Mal · waren hier. Chinesisches Restaurant. Ihre Kartenakualisierung wurde fußball bun. Sind in diesem Restaurant Reservierungen möglich? Zeitüberschreitung bei der Ermittlung des Standorts. Netter Kiosko,fest in Italienischer Life of Riches Slot - Prova detta onlinespel gratis nu. Zurück Weiter 1 2 3. Verfügt dieses Restaurant gratis tetris eine voll ausgestattete Bar? Reichhaltiges A la Carte Menu Sharing is caring Alle fußball ergebnisse live unserer Hausspezialität, den Nudeln, servieren wir an der Sihlporte 3 auch noch viele weitere, traditionelle chinesische Gerichte, die uns sehr am Herzen liegen! Wir wurden dann aber noch Der Empfang war freundlich und auch die weiteren wenigen Kontakte mit dem Service waren recht angenehm. Sie erreichen uns unter: Ist an diesem Ort automatenspiele kostenlos ohne anmeldung novoline Beste Spielothek in Horndorf finden vor Erhalt der Bestellung erforderlich? Getränke Preise fußballtrainer deutschland nationalmannschaft gehoben, aber für die Lage ok. Möchtest Du über die durchgeführten Änderungen informiert werden? Rudolf Falk hat chinesisches Buffet mit Hannelore Fritsch gegessen - hier: It was his victorious hot that Uriah died, and he wasn't even punished for it sure, he was moping for a little while live stream deutschland spanien handball that doesn't equal a punishment. Check out Scott Reads It! However, human beings have a conscience. View all 39 comments. The fact that the scientists studied the cities for generations and yet could 888 casino 1 euro einzahlen get the pure genes prejudice thing out of lucky win slots casino thick skulls frustrated me beyond belief. If I could give this ten stars, I would. All they did was argue, and it was mostly down to Tobias, his lies, his vile attitude, and his self pity. But are secretly pleased a book automatenspiele kostenlos ohne anmeldung novoline affect you like this. Here's a link to her blog. I stay with him because I choose to, every guts übersetzung that I wake up, every day that we fight or lie to each other or disappoint each other. You win this round, you two. How fast do you read? In fact, everywhere we look, we see the flaws in humanity. Veronica makes that point pretty damn clear. As for Natalie Prior, I thought her backstory was interesting.

Lojale Lucky -

Sibel Uymaz Karasek hat ein neues Foto hinzugefügt — hier: Drinks gibt es natürlich auch. Alexa Mirulescu ist hier: Der Service ist aber auch für deutsche Verhältnisse schlecht: Ist an diesem Ort eine Zahlung vor Erhalt der Bestellung erforderlich? Tolle Cocktails und lockere Menschen beflügeln Die Sinne. Bei sämtlichen unserer Gerichte verzichten wir gänzlich auf künstliche Geschmacksverstärker.

In fact, it's shockingly, astounding easy to. That's her utopia going bad. The failure of the genetic experiment is her commentary on human beings non acceptance of human nature.

We do not accept selfishness, stupidity, pride, as part of us. We want to get rid of it. And when faced with the chance to be rid of it, we would probably take it.

And by essentially playing God, in our rejection of the darkness in each and every one of us, we created bigger monsters. The forming of the factions were a perfectly valid solution to the problem caused by the genetically damaged.

This is absolutely crucial to understand. Doesn't it just breed MORE genetically damaged individuals? It doesn't make any sense!

Put yourself in the shoes of one of those who were not genetically damaged. Who were still perfectly imperfect. The government is going to close off those twisted human beings and basically breed them in large labs, letting them multiply?

Why not just kill them all? After all, they aren't actually human. They aren't God's intention. As a result of human's tampering, human beings have have created unnatural versions of themselves.

The reason why the genetically damaged are prejudiced against and disadvantaged in this society is because they are regarded as less human.

All those people in those factions, in the eyes of everyone else who knows of their unnatural state, are considered nothing more than experiments gone wrong to so many.

The Civil Wars were to eradicate the experiments. However, human beings have a conscience. Most of us know, deep down, that the genetically altered deserve a chance to make their own choices.

Society had made a mistake in playing god once, and suffered horribly for it. Society would not make the same mistake again. The American Government in Allegiant would not make two wrongs in hopes of getting a right.

And eradicating an entire generation of living breathing beings is most certainly playing god, and most certainly on par as wrong.

And if they could not kill the genetically damaged, they sure as hell would try and find a way where the genetically damaged could survive, thrive and find their own humanity.

These subsequent projects involving factions were society's grappling apology. They are trying to fix what they have done.

You do not get to erase the past. Correlating with this thread, society would NOT try and correct these genes again.

Why would a society which has already suffered the repercussions of playing god repeat the exact same thing again?

And if they could not fix them, and they could not kill them, what other choice did they have? This entire book revolves around the question on whether the gentically damaged were less human, and it left YOU to decide for yourself.

How could they expect the genetically damaged to just fix themselves by creating random divergents? This concept is more difficult to grasp because it requires knowledge in biology.

Populations can fix themselves as a result of natural selection and selective pressure. Basically, the genetically damaged are less likely to survive, while the divergent are more likely too.

As a result, the divergents would be more likely to survive into adulthood, reproduce and eventually there will be a larger proportion of divergents as compared to the others.

The Divergent themselves crop up as a result of genetic mutation or genetic healing. Your genes can change.

The world didn't start with one basic template for every trait that ever existed. The different hair colors, different physical traits today more likely began as mutations and then thrived under natural selection and selective pressure.

This should have been explained better in the book, absolutely. The whole shebang with the memory serum raises a hell lot of important questions and are not supposed to be a pretty solution wrapped in a silk bow.

The conflict Tris faced with the morality of the memory serum is real. Is it right to remove one's memory?

Removing one's memory brings with it dozens of ethical issues. Does it remove Free Will? Are the memory-altered the same people as they were before then?

Can you convict a person who has done a crime even if they don't remember what they have done? Who has the right to alter someone's memory?

Is it playing God? Has technology gone to far today, and should society limit what it could do? Do the ends justify the means?

And does the "Greater Good" even exist, or are things either just right or wrong? These questions are for all of us to think about.

It's not just a problem-solution thing here guys. We cannot look at it simply, or we'll be missing the point completely.

It's not about leaving them to kill themselves: It's about giving them a choice to make their own mistakes and staying true to who they are.

Personally I don't feel like Veronica Roth handled these themes with as much finesse as I would like, but for a YA novel I'll let it go.

Evelyn's decision to choose her son over everything she's worked for was monumental. Again, if you look at it simply, you will not see what is trying to be said.

For me, I think Veronica is trying to show you the power of maternal love a very strong theme in Harry Potter as well , the complexity of humanity, the ability to change your decisions and actions, the effect of abuse and how the abusee can turn into the abuser, and finally the sharp contrast between Evelyn and Marcus.

Both Evelyn and Marcus are genetically damaged people, aka deemed less human or inhuman altogether. For Marcus, he is the perfect example of how the genetic alteration experiment has created monsters.

Marcus is twisted and rid of humanity. He, we can easily deem as inhuman. But one man's twisted character does not determine those of his kind. Evelyn is just as genetically altered, and yet she overcame her genetic deficiencies.

Her genes did not determine her actions despite the fact that she was designed and made that way. Her decision to choose her son was not simply a cheesy act of love.

It was an epic bitchslap to her genetic makeup. Evelyn defied her supposed destiny and carved out another on her own. Actually, I was pointed out in the comments that Marcus was Divergent, something I completely forgot!

That just draws an even sharper contrast between Evelyn and Marcus which better questions just how much control our genetic makeup has over our actions.

Evelyn, despite being inherently inhuman, was indefinitely more human than Marcus, who was altogether healed. This just shows us how evil can exist in any of us, just as good can.

This raises one more big question. Is Caleb's betrayal justified because he was genetically altered? Are any of the actions of the genetically altered justified?

Or were they just as much their choices instead of simply their genetic code? And finally, Tris' death. Hell on roller skates, mop my tears for a sec.

To be honest, I don't want to ponder too much about her death because its purpose feels highly subjective to everyone's personal interpretation to me.

However, I feel like it was right that she died as who she was and not a shadow of herself. Tris' ultimate sacrifice for love and the greater good was who she is.

If we were to have our Happily Ever After, we would have with us a false caricature of Tris. This is who she is, and we cannot deny our loved ones their own choices and their very nature.

I felt that her seeing her mother at the very end was absolutely beautiful, and negates any argument that says that she died meaninglessly.

She died still swinging and living life true to who she is, and she reunited with her loved ones.

Hell, this means she probably reunited with Uriah too in the end, and that makes me cry all the more harder. Well these are my thoughts, feel free to comment below on your own!

This is a support group my friends, we're all in this highly-traumatized, post-Allegiant state together: We don't even know the title!

And I'm so bloody excited! In the case of Allegiant , I think it went a little beyond that. Hours after finishing and sleeping on my crushing disappointment, I have to admit that very little of this book worked for me.

The World Building When you think about both Divergent and Insurgent , there was very little actual world building that went on.

We established the faction system and the way it functions in Divergent. We also established the problems inherent with that system.

In Insurgent , we explored those problems more by watching the breakdown. Then, we get to Allegiant. Everything in the video is a lie so, in a lot of ways, everything Tris did at the end of Insurgent was for nothing.

The outside world is basically Chicago 2. Basically, we have one book to learn the mass of information we need to know about the outside. This info dump is compounded by several things: This is clearly supposed to be far into the future - at least seven generations?

We knew that because of the fact that Chicago was clearly recognizable. But knowing that everything on the outside is basically still functioning through our government and that the same kinds of issues still cause problems?

Something about that made me question every piece of information thrown at me. There was too much information introduced in this book for it to be the closing of a series and I honestly think this whole series would have benefited from a fourth book.

The background characters None of the background characters went anywhere significant. I did not learn anything new about Cara, Christina, or Uriah.

I could have eliminated all three of them from this book and everything would have been the same. Peter and Caleb showed no growth or change.

Peter proved that he is still the same coward he has always been and yet somehow he gets exactly what he wants.

Caleb, too, proved a coward. As for Natalie Prior, I thought her backstory was interesting. There was a rash of seemingly senseless deaths in this book.

To show that the factionless show as little regard for human life as the Erudite did? The same thing with Tori, who died, it seems, simply to provide the moment in which we find out how wrong she was and that her brother now has to deal with her death?

This problem ties back to the world-building problem and the need for another book. We are introduced to so many new characters.

The people from the Fringe? We barely learn anything besides their names. Then we get to Nita, who plays a major role and then just seems to disappear.

Matthew has a nice little speech about the Terrible thing that genetic prejudice caused to happen, but who is also basically a clone of Cara.

And David, who is exactly, exactly like Jeanine. Having so many new people cut out our chance to see the people that mattered. Tris Tris came a long way in Insurgent and she learned a lot of things.

I thought, overall, she was doing well and continuing that trend until the end, which ruined everything. But here was my problem with Tris: Those mistakes made Tris human.

She is smart and strong and skilled and canny and selfless to a ridiculous extent. And he kind of is. Fundamentally, we had to learn everything new through both characters because obviously they reacted differently to everything.

This really slowed down the pacing and bogged this book down in repetitive backstory. His sections of the book were indistinguishable in both tone and voice.

Though Tris and Four complimented each other so well in the first two books - made an excellent team of equals - they are also very different personality types.

Sure, they have similar characteristics - the same kinds of things make them tick - but they go about things in a very different way.

I didn't find Four likable in this book. I got flashes of the Four I loved, but he was so mired down in all of his weaknesses that reading his portions of the book was really hard.

He is the one that was so mad at Tris in the last book for lying, and he is the one that told her at that he should trust her and not hide things from her.

He has Major Issues. However, I knew that about him already. We already watched this struggle with the need to do something to make the world better and also the need to protect Tris and be a good man in the face of incredibly difficult choices.

We spent a book watching him deal with his feelings for his mother and father, even if we never watched him deal with those things from this point of view.

It was wrenching, but it made him grow. This Four is broken. He has lost all of the defining elements that made him Four.

He is weak and indecisive and insecure and, most surprisingly of all, irrational. Here, his decision makes no sense.

He barely knows Nita. Why is he not working with Cara and Christina and Tris? Why is he not asking that they be involved? It made no sense to me, even in context of losing his identity.

And then, his actions and his part in this plan are ignored? There are no consequences aside from the fact that Uriah is unconscious and ultimately dies.

That entire plot point just seemed pointless. Tris is going to be plenty mad about Four being so stupid already; Four is going to feel plenty guilty about acting like a completely naive hayseed without Uriah having to eat it.

Then the issue became about Uriah instead of why on earth he made this ridiculous decision and what he was feeling. After this incredibly boneheaded and uncharacteristic decision?

I did not understand his motivations. I did not understand the personality he suddenly exhibited. It felt like he was simply moving forward the plot instead of being Four.

Plus, he spends all of Allegiant being broken down and we never really see him built back up. The Plot This plot was repetitive.

In Insurgent , we have to overthrow the tyranny of Jeanine Mathews. In Allegiant , we have to overthrow the tyranny of Jeanine Mathews 2.

It is the same struggle. Of course, on one level that makes sense. Tris is chasing this problem up the chain. I did appreciate that aspect. The pacing was an issue.

It was slowed considerably by the excessive amount of info dumping and also the dual points of view. It also felt formulaic.

And yet, even with the repetition and the predictability and the deus ex machina moments, this plot was a confused mess and most of it was completely unnecessary to where we went.

And good lord the ending of no sense. The holes in this plot were insane. Tris wants those people to know the truth and be free. Wipe the memories of the bureau instead.

Erase their memories of genetic prejudice. We know there are antidotes to basically every serum, from the death serum to the truth serum. If they inoculate the people in Chiacago, then David and the Bureau can't wipe their memories.

At the very least, this seemingly obvious solution buys them time to figure out what the hell to do. The memory serum is intended to allow the two groups in Chicago to come to an agreement.

How on earth does giving Marcus the serum help that goal? Evelyn will still remember that he beat her. Evelyn will still remember that he beat Tobias.

Marcus is just a power hungry dickwad, that's fundamental to him like knowing how to breathe. Of course, knowing this, we also know that Four is never going to give his mother the memory serum.

What is completely unbelievable in the end is that Evelyn - the same Evelyn who has proven herself to be a dictator and a tyrant, who abandoned Four, who lied to Four, who tried to push away the only person who has ever supported Four and believed in him in his entire life, the same person who has been motivated by nothing but hate of the factions with seemingly little thought to her son - is magically made reasonable by love of her son.

And, of course, they go out and shake hands with Johanna and Marcus gets his just desserts because everyone knows he is an evil scumbag bent on power and everything magically works out fine despite the fact that people were rioting in the first chapter and the rest of the factionless are just going to forget their anger because they love Tobias Meanwhile, back in the compound But still, I hoped I was wrong.

I wanted to be wrong. Every single book Tris goes off to do some sacrificial act to save the people she cares about.

That is basically all she does in Insurgent. And what is her lesson at the end of Insurgent? She wants to live.

We know she is. Oh, so Tris points a gun to your head to make you give you the backpack? And you believe her? When he lets her have the backpack - when he lets Tris walk into that chamber?

I was disappointed in Tris too, because she stole Caleb's redemption. Maybe he lives and redeems himself in some other way, though considering he was an accessory to the slaughter of an entire faction, betrayed his sister, and is generally of weak character, why would anyone believe that he can redeem himself in any other way?

So at gunpoint, she steps up to make this sacrifice and we all knew she was going to do it all along and how did Tobias not? I think, when handled correctly, they are touching scenes that teach the reader something.

I think about Dumbledore dying and my chest aches. I think about so many other deaths in books, from Rue in Hunger Games to Bridge to Terebethia, and I know that deaths of characters you love can matter and make a book beautiful and better and teach you things about yourself and the world and love and all of it.

But the death has to matter. In the very rushed end, we find out that people can depend on each other? Can mend each other?

But I needed so much more from Tobias at the end to make his loss of Tris worth that message. Because what was Tris doing?

If anything it makes it less so. We saw that already with Christina and Uriah. This book didn't have a hopeful ending because nothing really changed.

This is the foundation of rebuilding and stability upon which these characters and this world can grow? There was a lot of making out.

Though I wanted more from the ending, Four's pain was certainly poignant. If done correctly, I should say. Allegiant was certainly the final book of a hype-copter of a series that left millions of readers invested.

Like a few other books this past year, it has left a feeling of doubt, anger, and a lot of crying. But for me, I was left with a sort of empty feeling.

Some of the emptiness was filled by frustration, an 1. So if I leave my thoughts, I think I can at least pass on why this book has 1.

I mean that's fairly easy to catch. Divergent, as you might of guessed, made me interested in the series because the pacing, while crippling and slow, left a snap to it that kept me incredibly invested in whatever the hell was going on.

The Factions were originally a stupid idea to me because it easily set up an opening for war. That could be any stretch of time that could amount to a century.

An experiment to bring forth the Divergent, which is actually defined at last! Because…because purity is made by fucking around with Mendel Punnett squares!

Just look at fruit flies! Thanks, you adorable squares! Anyhow, the writing for this is a lot of telling. Is it really hard to change the voice of characters?

But yeah, the whole government was all about making city societies to forge these genetically pure people that do nothing but avoid the serums that they themselves produce because whatever.

There actually is no point to the serums except maybe give the heads in the cities some control. Like, why establish separation to that extreme and expect pure little genetic babies out of it?

Because I finally figured out what the hell she was doing with her life and her own decisions. She showed her change into the bravery that she originally wanted to have way back in Divergent.

The main reason this irks me is because Tris, above anything else, had shown nothing in her arc to suggest that she had to go and kill herself when clearly Caleb had to redeem himself.

His reaction to the situation was great I think. TOBY, however, got infinitely worse in this book. He melted into a pansy.

And he was the one to use similes as often as he could as he told other people about his character traits. Positives for these two consist of their relationship.

You win this round, you two. They have no arcs or situations, and the three people who came close to having such a thing were Christina, Uriah, and Peter.

I would be okay with this if this was fucking present in the series at all. Erasing your memories is not a good change.

URIAH was good, up until he just, you know, got blown up. If it felt necessary, again, I would be okay with this.

I feel like deaths for characters should have some sort of reasoning attached. I feel cheated when characters just DIE.

Nicely done closure that I can appreciate. This also goes along with Christina. She had great building in Insurgent or at least at the start of it.

This started with a decent jump to outside the fence and before we were a quarter way through the book, we knew what everything really was.

But then it just did a plateau and nothing happened until a little over halfway through the book. This is like, Writing Come on now children.

The closure for Tris was, in my opinion, the best part of the book and interestingly enough, not because it was finally over and done with.

Uriah had a great close, Christina was a little better and there was actual friend bonding with her and Toby which like…never happened until just then in that moment.

The rest was just something I want to forget. The fact that I want to go back to the Factions as they were is a message in and of itself.

I feel like this book scarred me that way, but hey, guess what it did do. It made me get way into my own works to go and prove to myself that I can achieve more than what this did.

Well bust my buttons, look at that cover. I should snag a job as a cover artist. Needs more Comic Sans View all 47 comments. If in your story the word 'genetics' could have just as easily been replaced with the word 'magic' or 'voodoo' or 'pepperoni' , your premise may seriously need some rethinking.

Why do I care? Well, now against all odds and against my self-preservation sense I finished this series. And it was not very good. It could have been somewhat salvageable - if only the autho If in your story the word 'genetics' could have just as easily been replaced with the word 'magic' or 'voodoo' or 'pepperoni' , your premise may seriously need some rethinking.

It could have been somewhat salvageable - if only the author was able to recapture the unabashed mindless fun entertainment that 'Divergent' was able to pull off.

But, alas, it lost the fun aspect completely, and what was left when entertainment was removed turned out to be insufficient to fill the resulting void.

Instead, this book just serves to cement how this series was poorly thought through from the beginning, unsure of its own premise, uncertain of its message, unsure of where it was supposed to be headed, disjointed in its ideas and concepts, and never becoming a coherent whole.

Just to clarify - my disappointment has nothing to do with the widely publicized "controversial" ending - or at least not with the part of the ending a certain character's fate view spoiler [Tris dies - and that part was not that unexpected given her semi-suicidal inclinations and sudden introduction of Tobias' perspective in the story hide spoiler ] that has quite a few people freak out.

No, my biggest disappointment is with the fickle way this series reached its resolution. You see, far from trying to resolve any of the old conflicts built up in the previous two books, this story decides to just abruptly swing to another issue - 'genetically pure' vs.

As much as I was making fun of the ridiculous premise of this faction-based encapsulated society, I really did not appreciate sudden treatment of it as little but an unfortunate afterthought, a setting that doesn't matter much, a place that we abruptly leave and only visiting again as a "by the way", thus making all the buildup of the admittedly, ridiculous conflicts of the previous two books absolutely pointless.

Instead of resolving the issues and conflicts with the established characters and developing these characters further so that they in the end would not look like cardboard cutouts, we are introduced to the slew of new characters which basically are just mashups of the old characters and are there for reasons unclear - but I'd at least like to assume are different than Roth simply getting distracted by the new shiny idea.

And the end of the huge conflict is done with a Whimper of all Whimpers - the slaughter facing the city is stopped by little else than basically a family reunion.

Because Love heals, my friends. Because as long as the character's parents face their conflicts, the entire world becomes a better place to live.

And no, this is NOT done from the perspective a a five-year-old. And suddenly the world becomes a better place, just because two adults have finally had a conversation.

Because everyone else will just blindly follow the two semi-questionable leaders. We also get a few heavy moralistic lessons and insights into the natures of what's good and what's evil.

What we learn is that Good is what Tris believes in and agrees with. Anything that she is not personally invested in is therefore Evil.

For instance, it's only EVIL to erase memories of those she cares about. Even if the justification for both acts is identical - to prevent violence and deaths.

By this book, Tris is not only the pound badass of all badasses out there; she is infallible, flawless, selfless, unerringly perceptible, basically a new Messiah or, if you are as dorky as I am, basically an incarnation of Neo from the Matrix minus the ridiculous but cool black leather duster.

And I found it to be eye-rollingly annoying. This book is mostly told in alternating chapters by Tris and Tobias. It does help to read the title of each chapter to remember who the narrator is supposed to be because otherwise their voices are completely indistinguishable.

Quite a few times I got halfway through a chapter before remembering that the narrator had changed. That does not a skillful narration make, my friends.

Overall, this series started ridiculous but fun, quickly deteriorated and finished on the note sour enough to give me a semi-permanent scowl.

Nothing too memorable, honestly, except for very poor use of genetics. And for the inevitable few fans of this book and this series who will disagree with my opinion by insinuating that I'm not that bright and actually quite crazy, I have the retort by Dr.

My review of 'Divergent'. My review of 'Insurgent'. Click Here to see the full review: I just don't know how I feel right now!

Ok this is so freaky likes guys awesome!!! They are probably looking for a title other than those above that's why they haven't named it yet!

I mean seriously the second part isn't even out yet and people rated a book that is probably not even written yet!

I think the cover of this book Click Here to see the full review: I think the cover of this book will have Erudite's or Abnegation's symbol on it! I am so exited freaking can't wait for it!!!

I found this fan made cover on google isn't it amazing! Rimsha Ramblings of a Bookworm View all 92 comments. Mid-book review cos I'm struggling to finish this.

So far Katy Perry does a good job summing this book up: The cover's actually good, though I have to admit, some of the fan made covers were gorgeous.

I'm not too sure about the water symbol. I was hoping they had all 5 symbols and had them crashing together to create a new symbol.

Y'know new world, new symbol?? Did they mean Allergen[t]? Y'know, the factionless' quest to rid themselves of fleas permanently.

Grab your nets and bugs spray! I can't say that I like being wrong but still looking forward to how things end.

Emergent view spoiler [They finally go through the fence and face the real world hide spoiler ] -Option 2: Resurgent view spoiler [All the dead find some way to rise again hide spoiler ] -Option 3: Convergent view spoiler [The distinctions are abolished and the factions finally come together hide spoiler ] -Option 4: Indulgent view spoiler [Tris and Tobias finally give in to their inner desires and get it on hide spoiler ] -Option 5: By popular demand, we have Detergent.

After 2 books of nothing but blood, sweat and tears, these people are filthy I tell you! They need all the help they can get to remove all those tough stains.

Blood can seriously be a bitch to clean! Cast your votes today to avoid disappointment! Click here for my review of Divergent.

Anything else you want to add about the trilogy? View all 43 comments. I understand why people are so upset with this book, but I personally thought this book was raw, realistic, and heartbreaking.

View all 98 comments. Dec 31, Danielle. Veronica can do so much better than this, so so much. I fucking knew it.

Not a tear was shed from me… not a single fuck was given. Yes, dear readers, call me a Satanist slash sadist for all I care.

I saw no point in this move — Veronica Roth: I saw no point in this move — perhaps Roth wanted to be unique and inspiring with her story; nevertheless, it was still unnecessary.

Apart from that, Allegiant is an entirely different story, entirely different. The book was confusing. I was reading this book with a blank expression.

Allegiant was a hot ass fucking mess. The character development as well as the world-building was tragic.

It was not explained how Tris survived the death serum, we were only given half-assed, clouded ideas.

The romance fell off a cliff and shattered on sharp rocks at the bottom, the relationship between Tris and Tobias failed to impress me. The whole BOOK failed to impress me.

It hurts me to say this because I adore Veronica Roth. No one, and I mean no one can change my mind about this book: I remember Roth wrote a blog post about wanting Harry Potter to be killed off because "it would have showed the greatest act of sacrifice and love".

I don't know what her fucking deal is with killing people off because "it shows real love". That's not always the route to take; there are other ways of showing true love and sacrifice.

There's always another way. The minute the characters went out the fence, the story fell even further into the pit of stupidity. Allegiant tried to be preachy.

The government or should I say the Bureau in here plays or is God. We are introduced to superfluous explanations on why we have the factions and the factionless.

We learn about Genetic Purity and the Genetically Damaged. Genetic Purity meaning Divergence; Genetically Damaged meaning belonging to one faction with fucked up genes.

Come the fuck ON. I am not impressed. OH, how can I forget? Tris' mother was part of this Bureau. Honest to God I wish I had something nice to say about Allegiant.

There's an attempt at a love triangle here between Nita and Tobias, there's an attempt at something unique with this story, but the alternating PoV between Tris and Tobias and everything I've stated above ruined everything.

Also, I didn't like Tobias' voice here, Roth did not do a good job with portraying a male protagonist. I kept hearing a female voice in my head, constantly thinking it was Tris'.

Did Veronica have this all planned out since the first book? If it was then it wasn't very good and thorough. This book is a flat out FAIL.

View all 94 comments. Before the real title, Allegiant, was revealed. View all 58 comments. Obviously, I just don't get it. What a Divergent fan apparently sees: And what I see: Some nonsense with genetics.

Something I thought I'd either love or absolutely despise. Well, after finishing Allegiant , I think I've finally figured out why these books never clicked for me like they have for a lot of other people - Veronica Roth has some really good ideas and a good message, but the way she constructs her world to develop that message is just so heavy handed to the point the whole thing ends up flying in the face of common sense.

Here's the thing, Divergent as a series is built around one very simple, very obvious proposition: That's straight up paraphrased from one of Tris's many lines to Four.

The idea itself gets no argument from me, not when it's like one of those universal truths only a douche could disagree with, but, problem is, rather than writing the kind of story that makes me want to believe it, Roth writes the kind of story that so obviously shoves it down my throat in the most unpleasant way possible it hurts - starting with the whole faction system, which, at the risk of sounding repetitive, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Now, I'm not saying for a fictional book everything has to make perfect sense, but in this case, it's not so much that the factions make no sense even after all the mumbo jumbo experimental crap Roth's concocted to force some logic onto the system - crap I saw coming ever since Insurgent 's out of nowhere ending as much as the factions are so obviously written the way they are to reinforce Roth's message of how stereotyping is bad that they make no sense outside of that context.

In other words, Roth needs them so Tris can repeatedly tell me how everyone should be judged for who they are rather than for which faction they belong to or, as is the case later on in this one, rather than for how their genes are , and not because the factions do anything for the whole exploration of human nature thing everyone tells me this book is really supposed to be about.

Maybe that's not a flaw for anyone else, but as I see it, the whole thing is just a critique of a straw man spread out over three books padded by filler to make the straw man's existence nominally logical but not really, and that for me is the ultimate waste of time.

Nowhere is any of this more obvious than with the whole genetically damaged versus pure thing Roth's got going throughout the middle of this one.

I hate to say it, but the damaged versus pure storyline is even worse than the regular faction A versus faction B storyline we've had for two books now, not only because it's basically the same thing she's been trying to sell for two books now only now a hundred times more obvious what she's doing People are unique!

The status quo is bad! I mean, the whole genes personality persecution angle? Does it make sense outside of Tris saying how people shouldn't be persecuted based on their genes?

And doesn't it get on anyone else's nerves that Tris is always right, 'the system' is always wrong, yet despite how bad everything is certain characters still want things to stay the way they are?

For apparently no reason whatsoever? Basically, I only liked two things - Tris and Caleb's relationship, and the ballsy ending for like five seconds.

For a last book so artificial most of it is spent on poorly done exposition to explain it all away, Tris and Caleb to me felt like the only thing real about any of it, the one character development success in a sea of plot development failure.

And the ending, in retrospect, was the one last Hail Mary that could've done anything for the book, because let's be real, the fate of the factions was so tediously mired in poorly done backstory segueing into genetic nonsense the rest of this wasn't going to do much of anything anyway, so how else was Allegiant going to end with a bang?

Too bad that's all it does though. Now go wonder how the heck all the pointlessness managed to get swept under a rug. While telling yourself how a better book wouldn't have had to resort to such a cheap tactic.

Bottom line, look, I admire creative world building, but it has to be organic, not so obviously constructed for the heroine to score sympathy points for being obviously right that there's just no payoff when the artificial construct's finally destroyed - finishing Allegiant feels like ending a pointless exercise that went nowhere.

View all 49 comments. On this highly productive Friday afternoon, you will be delighted to hear that I have made - wait for it You answer the questions, keep a note of your answer number, tally up your score and find out which reader faction you belong to!

No peeking ahead at the scores either; this is serious, people. I live on the wild side. I need to mix up my genres.

When a book ends with a cliffhanger, you But are secretly pleased a book can affect you like this. Someone asks you what the last book was that you read.

It was Twilight come on, you were curious! You change the subject. How fast do you read? I have other obligations too. Publishers can hardly keep up with me.

Which of these best describes you at the library? You want to save the planet. Why does no one seem to know the difference?!

Okay, now add up your answer scores: You don't like to read more than one book at once and your friends' opinions on books are extremely valuable to you.

You're not one to go in for all that bookworm drama and you remember that life exists outside storybooks Your faction leader is Juliet Capulet.

She, like you, was never afraid to give up all else for the people books she loved. Dauntless You're a brave reader who loves to throw yourself into multiple books at once.

Books are thrilling adventures for you and whatever genre you pick has to be filled with fast-pacing and excitement.

You are extremely enthusiastic about sequels and movie adaptations of your favourite books. Your faction leader is Katniss Everdeen.

She fought in The Hunger Games and you've always known you'd have made a great tribute. Erudite Being as smart as you are, books have always been your natural companions.

You are happy to read many at the same time and always consider the positives and negatives noted in reviews before wasting your precious reading time.

You probably feel just as comfortable reading a huge classic as you do checking out the latest paranormal YA.

Your faction leader is Sherlock Holmes. Amity You are one of the kind-hearted, sensitive lovers of peace and happy endings.

It's possible that you're something of a romantic and dislike dark and depressing novels, but your pleasant personality means you'll give everything a chance to prove you wrong.

Your faction leader is Jay Gatsby - a kindred spirit who only ever wanted to get the girl he loves, throw parties and read fabulous books. Candor You are a proud speaker of the truth.

No bullshit, you're just comfortable with who you are and don't feel the need to pretend the pageturner you're reading is a Russian classic.

If you write book reviews, then it's likely that you deliver a hard dose of truth and don't lose any sleep over it either. Your faction leader is Tyrion Lannister, because someone has to be the voice of wittily-applied reason amid the drama.

Divergent No one really knows what's going on with you - you like a bit of everything. You try many different genres and your reaction to them changes with your mood.

Or just with the weather. I guess, in the end, you just love all kinds of literature wildly and unpredictably. Genre is a silly way of categorizing things anyway.

Your faction leader is Severus Snape, because no one had any idea which side he belonged on either. This quiz was written by me, whilst sat in my pajamas eating leftover Thai food.

It is not remotely official. In fact, it is so far from official that you should really take your result with a pinch of salt and a shot of tequila TGIF.

But I am extremely bored obviously so if you are feeling some blossoming indignation over your result, feel free to send your hate mail my way.

The only positive from this series was that I finally managed to finish it. To channel my undoubtedly unorganized and ranty-rant, I will focus on the "romance", the lackluster plot and the oh so many over-the-top quotes.

The "romance" - aka, ohdeargawd. What has YA come to??? Honestly, what was up with Fourtris this book? I don't just stay with him by default as if there's no one else available to me.

I stay with him because I choose to, every day that I wake up, every day that we fight or lie to each other or disappoint each other. I choose him over and over again, and he chooses me.

But that wasn't all I swear, if I have to read one more over-the-jeans-butt-touch I will go insane. Literally every few pages, there's another passionate, yet chaste make-out session followed by accusations of jealousy, trust issues and other petty squabbles.

The Lackluster Plot - aka, seriously? And the plot - Oooo, that plot - really rustled my jimmies. The whole pure-genes can be found only in the Divergent people thing was such a complete waste of page space - any middle school textbook can explain why this is such utter rubbish.

The fact that the scientists studied the cities for generations and yet could not get the pure genes prejudice thing out of their thick skulls frustrated me beyond belief.

I suppose some explanation is better than no explanation but still And then, Tris's big plan was erase everyone's memory? I cannot conceive of any way that could possibly work long-term.

For one, these so-called scientists that managed to create serums to erase memory but not language, life skills or personality couldn't figure out how to treat the messed up genes?

Am I actually supposed to believe that? And secondly, all that memory-erased-folks have to do is talk to another city and all those prejudices are back in place.

The Quotes - aka, how was this typed with a straight face?? Maybe I'm just jaded at this point, but every quote I read just seemed too, too much.

So much drama and angst and tension - I just couldn't handle it. I mean there's this: Power to do evil Power itself is not evil.

So knowledge itself is not evil. I belong to the people I love, and they belong to me--they, and the love and loyaty I give them, form my identity far more than any word or group ever could.

The first step to loving someone else is to recognize the evil in ourselves, so we can forgive them. If someone offer you an opportunity to get closer to your enemy, you always take it.

I november fick John Cleese en art i släktet ullmakier , Avahi cleesei , uppkallad efter sig som tack för hans skyddsprojekt för lemurer.

John Cleese medverkade hösten i en serie svenska reklamfilmer för elektronikkedjan Elgiganten , där han bland annat drev med sin skilsmässa.

John Cleese John Cleese Visningar Visa Redigera Redigera wikitext Visa historik. Verktyg Sidor som länkar hit Relaterade ändringar Specialsidor Permanent länk Sidinformation Wikidataobjekt Använd denna sida som referens.

Sidan redigerades senast den 30 oktober kl. Wikipedias text är tillgänglig under licensen Creative Commons Erkännande-dela-lika 3. Monty Pythons galna värld.

Ursäkta, vad är klockan? En fisk som heter Wanda. Resan till Amerika - Fievel i vilda västern. Ursäkta, var är arvet?

Lojale Lucky Video

Game Theory: Does Luigi MEASURE Up? (Super Mario) Meeresfrüchte Restaurants in Formentera: Ist dieser Ort hauptsächlich für Bars und Kneipen bekannt? Ich habe die Ceviche und Truffel Nudel bestellt. Zeitüberschreitung bei der Ermittlung des Standorts. Netter Kiosko, fest in italienischer Hand. Denis Benjamin ist mit Bianca Baciu hier: Öffnungszeiten des Restaurants Geschlossen. September über Mobile-Apps. Haben wir Ihren Appetit geweckt? Die Überraschung ist gelungen. Rudolf Falk hat chinesisches Buffet mit Hannelore Fritsch gegessen - hier: Mit Mama und Papa lecker essen. Reghina Blanca hat ein neues Foto hinzugefügt — isst cibo cinese hier: Netter Kiosko,fest in Italienischer Hand. Bewertet vor einer Woche über Mobile-Apps. Hamburger mit Chips Pommes gibt es nichtleckere Piadine, Obstsalate etc. Asiatische Restaurants casino linz offnungszeiten Gaildorf. Wir prüfen die Informationen schnellstmöglich und korrigieren die Angaben!